Contents Page

Services

Contact Information

Check out

Geochemical Workshops 

  Comments & Views

Groundwater Geochemistry

Isotope Geochemistry

Search the site or Web

Feedback

Uranium Exploration - The Lead Connection  

This page contains a number of diagrams that may take some time to down load. Please be patient....

The CSIRO Division of Exploration and Mining and Rutherford Mineral Resource Consultants participated in a research project in 1990 to develop more effective geochemical and mineralogical techniques for the detection of uranium mineralization in regional exploration in the west Arnhem Land region of tropical northern Australia.

Two significant exploration problems were present in this major uranium province that needed to be addressed. The first related to access problems in this remote area and the large tracts of land that needed to be explored (several thousand km2), much of it covered by Tertiary to Recent coarse, largely quartz-rich sand derived from erosion of the prominent Kombolgie Sandstone units that cap much of the province.  The second problem was the need to distinguish between uneconomic secondary uranium accumulations and anomalies associated with primary uranium mineralization. 

The Pb isotope composition of Proterozoic uranium ores and their weathered equivalents was found to be distinctive and very different from that of recent secondary uranium accumulations. Pb isotopes thus provided an objective technique for discriminating potentially fertile anomalies from "false anomalies".

Partial leach procedures designed to strip only the most mobile Pb from stream sediment samples were utilised.  This was done to enable collection of Pb precipitated from solution in stream waters that was released by the radioactive decay of uranium and weathered from a primary uranium source. The sensitivity of Pb isotope analyses suggested that the technique could be used in regional-scale geochemical exploration programs.

Conventional Pb isotopic analysis is undertaken using thermal ionization mass spectrometers, which give excellent precision, but have a relatively slow throughput and high cost.  However, in the search for uranium mineralization, such high precision is not required, and analyses can be carried out at a fraction of the cost using ICP-MS.

The threshold between background, or country rock, values of m-1 and values probably indicating the presence of U mineralization can be estimated from:

The relative abundance of U and Th in unmineralised country rock. Such U and Th relationships are available from  published geochemical information.

The distribution of m-1 values determined in previous studies of barren rocks and exploration samples.

The rock units which make up the provenance of soils and stream sediments in the Arnhem Land region are the Kombolgie Formation (arenite, volcanic interbeds), the Cahill Formation (predominantly biotite-muscovite schists), the Nabarlek Granite (and Tin Camp Granite), the Zamu Dolerite and the Oenpelli Dolerite.

The relationship between the U/Th ratios and m-1 values is as follows:

                                                                         238U

                                                            m-1   ------- X C

                                                                        232Th

 where C is a function of the decay constants of 238U and 232Th and the age of the rocks.  The variable C is relatively insensitive to even large age differences as can be seen from Table 1.

 TABLE 1

 VALUES OF C FOR ROCKS OF VARYING AGES.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

(Age Ma)         C

1500                3.40

1000                3.31

  500                3.22

  100                3.15

----------------------------------------------------------------

A value of 3.35 is acceptable for Arnhem Land.

A broad estimate of the expected background U and Th compositions can be gained by reference to accepted global averages for the rock types present. These are shown in Table 2.

 TABLE 2

U, Th AND CALCULATED m-1 VALUES FOR VARIOUS ROCK TYPES

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Rock Type                                    Th                   m-1

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Granite                       5                     22                    0.8

Sandstone                 1                                          1.2

Basalt                         0.4                  1.6                   0.9

Granite gneiss            4                   13                    0.9

 

(Data from Rogers and Adams, 1969a, b)

Data specific to the Arnhem Land region are also available and these are summarized in Table 3.

 TABLE 3

 U, Th AND CALCULATED m-1 VALUES FOR ROCK UNITS IN THE ARNHEM LAND REGION.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unit                         No           U(ppm)                  Th(ppm)                      m-1

                            Samples      mean                    mean                      mean            r

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kombolgie                 10           5.7           4.9           20.8           14.1           0.9           0.3

Formation (arenite)

 Nungbalgarri                        2.7                         10.8                          0.9             -

Volc. Member

 Zamu Dolerite                      2.3            1.0             8.1             6.2          1.6            1.1

Tin Camp                              11                              63                           0.6             -

Granite

 Cahill Formation      38          4.6             2.6            17.1            5.6           0.9          0.3

(unmineralised)

(Data from various papers in Ferguson and Goleby, 1980; part of Kombolgie Sandstone data from this study).

Therefore, the upper threshold of the background (country rock) population of expected m-1 values for exploration samples on, or derived from, Kombolgie Formation or Cahill Formation lithologies is 1.5 (mean + 2r). These two units represent the major provenance of soils and stream sediments in the region.

Soils or stream sediments associated with the Tin Camp Granite should have a similar or slightly lower threshold, but those associated with the Zamu Dolerite (and probably by analogy the Oenpelli Dolerite) will have slightly higher thresholds, probably about 2.

Measured m-1 Values of Unmineralised Rocks

In previous studies (Dickson et al., 1985; Gulson and Mizon, 1980) and for the 1990 study, the Pb isotopic compositions of unmineralised sequences of country rock and associated soils have been determined. The measured m-1 values based on these results are similar to, but are not necessarily exact equivalents of the values calculated from chemical analyses and discussed in the previous section. Differences could result from the partial decoupling of U and Th during metamorphism or incipient weathering, which will not be reflected in the isotopic ratios of the Pb daughter products.

However, the average measured m-1 values shown in Figure 1 are similar to the calculated values. In comparison to the very high average values for U mineralization, country rock data for the Drillers Pool radon anomaly and the Koongarra North Grid have an average m-1 value of 0.6 and country rock from drill holes into the Kombolgie Formation have an average m-1 of 1.1. The mean m-1 of this data is 0.91 with r = 0.26.  Thus the mean + 2r = 1.43 which is very similar to the values of 1.5 calculated from the chemical data.

Based on all the above data, the upper country rock m-1 threshold for sediments and soils derived from the Kombolgie Formation lithologies, the Cahill Formation and granitoids of the region is considered to be 1.5. Thus values of > 1.5 measured in exploration samples have < 5% chance of representing unmineralised country rock and warrant follow up exploration.

Where there has been a significant input from the Zamu or Oenpelli Dolerites a higher threshold, probably about 2, should be used. 

A plot of all available data from the Arnhem Land region, both mineralized and unmineralised, with 206Pb/204Pb ratios < 70 are shown in Figure 1.

 

   Figure 1.  Comparison of the fields for country rock and U mineralisation on a 208Pb/204Pb vs 206Pb/204Pb diagram. Note that the fields have overlapping 206Pb/204Pb ratios between about 17 and 70 and thus the Pb isotope ratio alone cannot always be used to discriminate U mineralisation from country rock in areas distance from mineralisation.

PRESENTATION OF RESULTS

Results are usually presented in two forms:

         i)             On XY plots with the ratios 206Pb/204Pb and 208Pb/204Pb as the axes;

    ii)           On XY plots showing on one axis either distance along a traverse or drainage channel or depth down a drill hole. On the other axis is shown a comparison of Rn and/or U content, where available, with the 206Pb/204Pb ratio and the function m-1.

The 206Pb/204Pb ratio is directly related to the age and U/Pb ratio of the rocks. It will thus be high in the Proterozoic mineralization of an area and also in associated secondary dispersion plumes. It will be low in normal country rocks and in Pb associated with recently formed U accumulations.

It may not be possible to define a threshold 206Pb/204Pb ratio to distinguish anomalous samples from "background" country rock because there is a significant overlap as can be seen in Figure 1 on which are plotted the fields for known U mineralization, including the low grade haloes, and for country rock. These fields are based on all available data from the Alligator Rivers region (Gulson and Mizon, 1980; Dickson et al., 1985, Carr and Dean, 1987). The 206Pb/204Pb ratios of samples associated with U mineralization vary from ≈ 17 to > 1000 and for country rock between 17 and ≈70 and in one instance up to 200.

To distinguish the country rock and U mineralization "signatures" in this important overlap range, the differences in 208Pb/204Pb ratio must also be taken into account. This is accomplished by reference, to the function m-1;

    206Pb/204Pb                (206Pb/204Pb(S) - 206Pb/204Pb(IR))

m-1   =        -------------------     =     -----------------------------------------------

      208Pb/204Pb                (208Pb/204Pb(S) - 208Pb/204Pb(IR))

which represents the inverse of the slope on the 208Pb/204Pb vs 206Pb/204Pb diagram of a line joining a data point (S) with the assumed initial ratio (IR) of Proterozoic Pb. It thus provides a simple descriptor of the relative amounts of radiogenic 206Pb and 208Pb and thus the U/Th ratio of the parent rock (238U decays to 206Pb and 232Th decays to 208Pb; U/Th = m-1/3.35, see above).

Values of less than 1.5 are considered to have a very high probability of representing the normal range for unmineralised country rock (Kombolgie Formation, Cahill Formation, regional granites). Values greater than 1.5 are considered to have a high probability of being associated, at least in part, with U enrichment. The derivation of this threshold is discussed above.

ORIENTATION STREAM SEDIMENT SURVEY USING Pb ISOTOPES

The aim of the survey was to establish the viability of using the Pb isotopic signature of bulk samples of stream sediments as a regional reconnaissance tool for detection of primary uranium mineralisation in an analogous way to BLEG or BCL sampling is used in gold exploration.  Analysis of stream sediment samples from an orientation survey conducted in drainage out from the small Caramel uranium deposit south of Nabarlek were used to trial the method.  

Most of the sediment in drainages of the west Arnhem Land province is dominated by coarse, predominantly quartz-rich sand and there is little in the way of fine fraction material. Such material presents problems for sampling in that fine material (silts and clays), that would be the most suitable fraction for analysis for uranium, is not always available to collect at a particular site. In addition multiple sources for uranium, that is both primary Proterozoic age (that associated with mineralisation) and secondary young, widely transported, 3° and 4° age accumulations in black soil, laterite etc., can not be discriminated by routine geochemical analysis. 

A strategy was therefore needed to discriminate between these and to make use of the sample materials available. As stated above the Pb isotope composition of Proterozoic uranium ores and their weathered equivalents has been found to be distinctive and very different from that of recent secondary accumulations thus providing an objective technique for discriminating potentially fertile anomalies from "false anomalies".  Because high precision is not required the relatively cheap ICP-MS technique (rather than thermal ionisation mass spec) was used to determine the definitive isotopic ratios. 

The method easily detected the presence of uranium from the Caramel site by a distinctive Pb isotopic signature, at the most distant point of sampling, some 1.7 km from the source.    At this point the signature from uranium and Pb by routine geochemical analysis of the sediment had fallen to below the detection limit of the analytical method used (XRF).  It could be anticipated that the Caramel site would have been detectable at a much greater distance by the isotopic method. 

The success of the approach offers scope for the simple collection of bulk sample material and direct detection of primary uranium mineralisation in regional stream surveys.  It would be envisaged that catchments of at least 5-15 km2 could be screened with a single sample. The area incorporated in a sample would depend upon the disposition of individual drainage catchments in the area to be sampled and complexity of the geology and regolith within each catchment.

Figure 1.  Summary of geology and location of stream sediment samples (grid spacing 500 metres).

Figure 2.  Plot of +80# fraction of stream sediments for base metals down drainage from mineralisation.  The high Ni and Zn values are related to sheared, altered and weathered dolerite units in the basement; the Pb is sourced locally from the from mineralisation.

Figure 3.  Plot of -80# fraction of stream sediments for base metals down drainage from mineralisation.

Figure 4.  Plot of both fractions of stream sediments for uranium and isotopic function m-1 down drainage from mineralisation.  The " raw isotopic ratio value" needs to be "corrected" for age, rock type and differences in initial lead ratios for 208Pb/204Pb vs 206Pb/204Pb.  An "isotopic function" m-1 of  >1.5 - 2 and above is considered to be potentially anomalous.  Values up to several hundred are generally found associated with local dispersion from primary Proterozoic uranium mineralisation in the Arnhem Land region.  Secondary young accumulations of uranium in reducing environments (black soil) or Fe-laterite are typically about 1 or less.

Contact: 

Graham Carr,  CSIRO Division of Exploration and Mining, email:  Graham.Carr@CSIRO.au

 

 

   Some more illustrative material will be added soon.

Top of Page

Send e- mail to rminres@zip.com.au with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: April 28, 2003